After being informed of her termination, she received a letter stating that her pregnancy was high risk and there was no safe position they could put her in on the force. Does this mean that the reason she was fired was because of her pregnancy? Thompson reports that her doctor gave her permission to still perform four of the six major tasks of her job, and her pregnancy was never referred to as high risk.
Thompson was also given a disciplinary letter stating that she needed to remain more careful on her job and the discipline was due to issues with keeping herself safe.
The Chief of Police was interviewed but he did not give any comments on the situation, instead referred the interviewer to another source, that of which was also unable to answer any questions.
I think that if a woman who is pregnant does not feel safe in her work environment and considers herself to be largely at risk, then she will quit or inform her superior of this. It is unfair to just assume that a woman who is pregnant is unable to perform her job as she has been doing for previous years. I'm sure that there are desk jobs in the police station that she could have been switched to.
Here is the link to the video found on CNN:
